Question
Final Essay Instructions
This course has sketched two competing narratives used by modern thinkers to justify their arguments for appropriate political and economic arrangements. In general, one narrative places the value of individual liberty most highly, and argues that individual liberty is best promoted through some form of private property, and best protected through limited government. The other narrative places the value of equality most highly and argues that equality is best promoted through the limitation or abolition of private property, and best established through revolutionary government. But the liberty narrative does not necessarily deny the importance of equality, and the equality narrative does not necessarily deny the importance of liberty.
Write an essay (six to eight pages in length) in which you explore the role of “equality” within the liberty narrative, and the role of “liberty” within the equality narrative. Pay special attention to how those operating in the liberty narrative define “equality,” and to how those operating in the equality narrative define “liberty.” What descriptions of human nature underlie their respective definitions, and how do you evaluate their descriptions of human nature in light of Christian teachings? Finally, since both liberty and equality are Christian values, evaluate each narrative tradition with regard to how well it addresses the challenge of securing both liberty and equality. Which does the better job of securing both values, and why?
Final Essay Rubric
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | ||||
| Content (70%) | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present | Total |
| Assigned Readings (50%) | 135 to 150 points: Responds directly and thoughtfully to the essay prompt.Provides a well-reasoned synthesis of key ideas from readings.Supports assertions with appropriate research and numerous citations from all required reading.Demonstrates detailed understanding of required reading, and engages additional learning, to provide an in-depth, researched discussion of the assigned questions. | 120 to 134.75 points: Responds directly to the essay prompt.Provides some synthesis of key ideas from readings.For the most part, supports assertions with appropriate research and citations from required reading.Demonstrates basic comprehension of required reading reading to provide a discussion of the assigned questions. | 1 to 119.75 points: Fails to respond directly to the essay prompt.Largely fails to provide a meaningful synthesis of key ideas.Limited or misguided use of research and citations to support assertions.Does not demonstrate basic comprehension of required reading. | 0 points Not present | |
| Biblical Integration (20%) | 54 to 60 points: Provides a nuanced discussion of Biblical concepts as related to the content and assigned questions. | 48 to 53.75 points: For the most part, provides a discussion of Biblical concepts as related to the content and assigned questions. | 1 to 47.75 points: Provides only a limited discussion of Biblical concepts as related to the content and assigned questions. | 0 points Not present | |
| Structure (30%) | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present | Total |
| Sources & Citations (10%) | 27 to 30 points: References each assigned primary source – in support of the essay’s thesis – three or more times.Responds directly and clearly to one or more interpretations offered in the assigned secondary source (Strauss/Cropsey). | 24 to 26.75 points: References each assigned primary source – in support of the essay’s thesis – less than three times.Attempts to respond to one or more interpretations offered in the assigned secondary source (Strauss/Cropsey). | 1 to 23.75 points: Does not reference each assigned primary source, or references primary sources that do not support the essay’s thesis.Does not respond to one or more interpretations offered in the assigned secondary source (Strauss/ Cropsey), or does not integrate the response with the essay’s thesis. | 0 points Not present | |
| Grammar & Formatting (10%) | 27 to 30 points: Limited to no errors in grammar, spelling, formatting, etc. | 24 to 26.75 points: Some errors in grammar, spelling, formatting, etc. | 1 to 23.75 points: Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, formatting, etc. | 0 points Not present | |
| Page Length (10%) | 27 to 30 points: 6-8 full pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced. | 24 to 26.75 points: 5 full pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced. | 1 to 23.75 points: Less than five full pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced. | 0 points Not present | |
| Professor Comments: | Total: | /300 |
Solution
Liberty and Equity
While dealing with the relationship between liberty and equality, it seems challenging to reach both values at the am time. From a common-sense perspective, people tend to view the principles of liberty and equality as two opposing ones more than two principles that need each other. From a libertarians’ perspective, the characteristic of equality tending to make up for people’s deficiencies with outside help impedes the exercise of liberty. On the other hand, liberals view the conflict between equality and liberty through the argument that it prevents some individuals from doing what they want to do when there is a certain criterion to distribute goods and services in society (Christmas, 2019). However just as equality is not viewed as an ideal of total uniformity or leveling of human treatment liberty is not taken as ideal freedom for everyone to do whatever they want to do. Despite the tension between the principles of liberty and equality, this paper will discuss how the two values are irreconcilable or incompatible.
The Role of Liberty within the Equality Narrative
Equality viewed as is equal treatment of humans that they live equally well and have equally desirable and valuable lives (Ferrari, 2016). This would require a political institution that is arranged to ensure the quality of condition or equality of welfare. According to John Rawls, a proponent of egalitarianism, in a just society, people agree to share each other’s fate such as being born into poverty, by trying to counteract the advantages and disadvantages naturally distributed in the society. Thus, one to achieve this is by the distribution of goods and services in that they to equalize the conditions in which people live their lives in the society, goods produced. According to Ripstein (2007), the primary aim of the value of equality is to ensure that each individual lives roughly equally well. Although this proposal may sound plausible it invites various problems as developing an acute of how this welfare would be measured in case of equality based on welfare. As a result, this invites different ways that to some part integrates the value of liberty because they are based on the view that everyone bears the responsibility of their own welfare. These approaches include equality of resources and equality of welfare. According to equality of resources, the level of well-being achieved will depend on how everyone disposes of the resources that are equally endowed to them (Christmas, 2019). In this case, an individual has the freedom on how to deploy those resources thus the conception of the ideal equality is only applicable in the entitlement to the resources. After the endowment, society owes an individual no more…………for help with this assignment contact us via Email Address: consulttutor10@gmail.com