Case Study Project – Language and Power


Assignment 4 – Case Study Project

Social Issue: Language and Power

For this final project you will continue with the social issue that you selected (language and power; freedom and security; health and wealth) and you will write an essay where you discuss your perspective. You will use the ideas and information from the summary-response and the quote log to write your case study. 



  • Describe a “real life” instance of your selected social issue in a professional or a personal setting.
  • Discuss your perspective on your selected social issue, including the reasons for your viewpoint.
  • Discuss how your core values inform or influence your perspective on your selected social issue.
  • Demonstrate that you are really thinking about your issue—don’t settle for easy answers, don’t pretend that conflicting evidence doesn’t exist, and don’t feel that you have to take an either-or position.
  • Discuss the complexities of your selected social issue. For example, do not just conclude that using academic language is always good, or that government surveillance is always bad, or that wealth automatically leads to health. Think about the intricacies of these issues and how they play out in everyday life.


  • Include an introductory paragraph, where you clearly outline a “real-life” instance of your social issue and you give a thesis statement that indicates your perspective (see Part 2: Writing Your Introduction for an example).
  • Include 3-5 body paragraphs where you include details, examples, and quotes from at least three of the course readings to help you develop and support your key points (see Part 3: Writing Your Body Paragraphs. for an example). 
  • Include one body paragraph where you discuss how your core values inform or influence your perspective on your selected social issue (see Part 3: Writing Your Body Paragraphs for an example).
  •   End your essay with a concluding paragraph where you restate your thesis, summarize your key points, and leave the reader with the “so what?” ( see Part 4: Writing Your Conclusion for an example).
  • EXAMPLE attached in another file

Sources and Documentation

  • You are required to use three sources for this assignment. Your sources should be selected from the assigned course readings on your selected issue (language and power; freedom and security; health and wealth).
  • Your paper should use APA-style documentation for in-text citations. You do not need to complete a reference page.
  • Using additional sources: If you choose to do so, you can include sources above and beyond the three required sources from the assigned readings. You must include a reference page for any sources you use that are not from the assigned readings. Doing so will count as “additional labor” (see below).

Format and Length

  • Your paper should include a header consisting of your name and the assignment name and a title tailored to your topic. (See example below.)
  • Your paper should be typed, double-spaced and in 12-point font.
  • Your final product should be a minimum of six paragraphs (about 900-1100 words) in length. However, the quality of the content of this essay is most important. Be sure to fully answer the prompt. 

#B The reflection questions are to be answered separately. (They are not part of the essay.) Post these in the “comments” box when submitting your assignment. You can number your answers or write the in paragraph form. Be sure to address all four questions.

  1. Aside from simply meeting the requirements, what were your personal goals for this assignment?
  2. When reviewing your language choices, what choices did you make to approach your goals for staying within or moving beyond conventions for academic writing?
  3. What parts of your work on this assignment are you most proud of?
  4. What challenged you in this assignment and/or where do you need additional support from your instructor?

Sources: My topic: language and power

You are required to use three sources for this assignment

Assigned Readings:

McWhorter, J. (2012, August 13). Good applicants with bad grammar. New York Times.

Rushkoff, D. (2013, January 30). It’s not just grammar: It’s clear thinking. New York Times.

Haussamen, B. (2012, August 13). What good writing indicates, and doesn’t. New York Times.

Truss, L. (2012, August 13).The harm when schools play down grammar. New York Times.

Challenger, J. (2012, August 13). Consider the candidate and the position. New York Times.


                                          Language and power

Regarding language and power, the ability to use proper grammar communication sets an individual apart from the rest. Good grammar is very noticeable, and if two individuals with similar qualifications apply for the same open job, the one making grammatical errors will have lower chances of getting the first call. Even though not all jobs require the proper use of grammar and strong communication skills, most prefer them, and many applicants have failed to get the jobs because of poor grammar despite their talents, qualifications, and other skills. For instance, Wiens (2012) states that he received an email from a job candidate whose grammar in the email was not that great, and he rejected him because of his poor grammar. He argues that even though some of his colleagues disagreed, arguing that spelling did not predict how successful someone will become and that bad writing and grammatical errors are common in his country, his concern is not how skilled or a great leader someone is (Wiens, 2012).  He asserts that job candidates who discredit themselves through spelling or grammar errors limit their careers. From an employers’ perspective, an employee with good writing skills is far more promotable and valuable than one making grammatical mistakes.  Therefore, considering the power of language, some job candidates have an added advantage over others rooted in the proper use of grammar.

At first, for most employers and organizations, it is essential that their employees exhibit good grammar. According to Challenger (2012), “One of the easiest, quickest and most widely used indicators of a candidate’s worth is his or her grammar.” During hiring, an applicant’s quality of grammar is considered essential and is a significant determinant of whether they will get the job or not. This traditional criterion is still preferable by many employers and companies who continue to apply it. As Smith and Taylor (2020) argues, Eliminating and selecting candidates for a job position based on their grammar is still a relevant and common practice. The power of language in employment is evident in the significance of grammar in the hiring process. As a result, those who have good, unambiguous, and clear writing skills are in a better position to be hired than those who have poor grammar regardless of their competence in other job-related skills ……………for help with this assignment contact us via email Address:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *